Absolute Actuality and the Plurality of Worlds
نویسنده
چکیده
Let’s fix some terminology at the start. A world (or possible world – for me, the ‘possible’ is redundant) is, first, an individual, not a set or class; second, a particular, not a property or universal; third, concrete in this sense: it is fully determinate in all qualitative respects; and, fourth, a maximal interrelated whole: each world is internally unified, and isolated from every other world. There is at least one world, the world we are part of. It is an actual world, the actual world if there are no “island universes.” Worlds that are not actual (if any) are merely possible. A realist about possible worlds believes that there is a plenitudinous plurality of worlds: whenever something is possible – for example, that donkeys talk, or that pigs fly – there is a world in which it is true. There is more than one way to be a realist about possible worlds. Realists divide into two camps depending upon their account of actuality. According to David Lewis,
منابع مشابه
Concrete Possible Worlds
in virtue of violating (C4): they are not fully determinate; it is neither true nor false of numbers, for example, that they are red, or weigh ten grams. But that is not how I see it. Indeed, the pure sets, or sui generis numbers, or Euclidean points have no intrinsic qualitative nature, but not because they are somehow abstractions from something else. Rather, they determinately fail to instan...
متن کاملActing with things: Self-poiesis, actuality, and contingency in the formation of divine worlds
The aim of this study is to investigate how divine worlds can be created, vitalized, and lived by people. Focusing not on cognition and operating through things but on bodily action with things, this paper examines the actuality of these actions, which occur prior to the cognitive articulation of the event and create novel experiences of the world. It reconsiders Alfred Gell’s theory of idolatr...
متن کاملCommentary David Lewis On the Plurality of Worlds Oxford : Blackwell
David Lewis is one of the most influential philosophers of our age, and On the Plurality of Worlds is his magnum opus. OPW offers an extended development and defense of the hypothesis that there are many universes, things of the same kind as the universe in which we all live, move, and have our being. Lewis calls these universes ―worlds‖, deliberately recalling the notion of a ―possible world‖ ...
متن کاملActuality Entailments: When the Modality is in the Presupposition
In the context of the study of modality in interaction with time, the phenomenon whereby a modalized proposition entails its non-modal counterpart has been known as an ‘actuality entailment’ since Bhatt (1999). The question that actuality entailments raise is how modal statements can be distinguished from their non-modal counterparts and how modal contributes meaning. The main idea that the pap...
متن کاملPossibility, actuality, and the growth of imagination: The many-worlds approach to quantum physics
Everett-DeWitt interpretations of quantum physics speak of a multiplicity of physically coexisting worlds. These imaginative reactions to the conceptual problems of standard quantum mechanics form a family of physicalist “many-worlds” proposals (PMW for short) that have been variously dismissed as “incoherent”, so far without full success. A renewed charge by Hilary Putnam now seems to pose dee...
متن کامل